首页> 外文OA文献 >Quality of life questionnaire predicts poor exercise capacity only in HFpEF and not in HFrEF
【2h】

Quality of life questionnaire predicts poor exercise capacity only in HFpEF and not in HFrEF

机译:生活质量调查表仅在HFpEF中预测运动能力差,而在HFrEF中则预测运动能力差

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is the most widely used measure of quality of life (QoL) in HF patients. This prospective study aimed to assess the relationship between QoL and exercise capacity in HF patients. Methods: The study subjects were 118 consecutive patients with chronic HF (62 +/- 10 years, 57 females, in NYHA I-III). Patients answered a MLHFQ questionnaire in the same day of complete clinical, biochemical and echocardiographic assessment. They also underwent a 5 min walk test (6-MWT), in the same day, which grouped them into; Group I: <= 300 m and Group II: > 300 m. In addition, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), divided them into: Group A, with preserved EF (HFpEF) and Group B with reduced EF (HFrEF). Results: The mean MLHFQ total scale score was 48 (+/- 17). The total scale, and the physical and emotional functional MLHFQ scores did not differ between HFpEF and HFpEF. Group I patients were older (p = 0.003), had higher NYHA functional class (p = 0.002), faster baseline heart rate (p = 0.006), higher prevalence of smoking (p = 0.015), higher global, physical and emotional MLHFQ scores (p < 0.001, for all), larger left atrial (LA) diameter (p = 0.001), shorter LV filling time (p = 0.027), higher E/e' ratio (0.02), shorter isovolumic relaxation time (p = 0.028), lower septal a' (p = 0.019) and s' (p = 0.023), compared to Group II. Independent predictors of 6-MWT distance for the group as a whole were increased MLHFQ total score (p = 0.005), older age (p = 0.035), and diabetes (p = 0.045), in HFpEF were total MLHFQ (p = 0.007) and diabetes (p = 0.045) but in HFrEF were only LA enlargement (p = 0.005) and age (p = 0.013. A total MLHFQ score of 48.5 had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 63% (AUC on ROC analysis of 72%) for limited exercise performance in HF patients. Conclusions: Quality of life, assessment by MLHFQ, is the best correlate of exercise capacity measured by 6-MWT, particularly in HFpEF patients. Despite worse ejection fraction in HFrEF, signs of raised LA pressure independently determine exercise capacity in these patients.
机译:背景:明尼苏达州心衰患者生活调查表(MLHFQ)是HF患者生活质量(QoL)方面使用最广泛的指标。这项前瞻性研究旨在评估HF患者的QoL与运动能力之间的关系。方法:研究对象为118例连续性慢性HF患者(62 +/- 10岁,57名女性,在NYHA I-III中)。患者在完成临床,生化和超声心动图评估的同一天回答了MLHFQ问卷。他们还在同一天进行了5分钟的步行测试(6-MWT),将他们分组;第一组:<= 300 m,第二组:> 300 m。此外,左心室(LV)射血分数(EF)分为:保留EF的A组(HFpEF)和EF降低的B组(HFrEF)。结果:MLHFQ平均总分得分为48(+/- 17)。 HFpEF和HFpEF之间的总评分以及身体和情绪功能性MLHFQ评分没有差异。 I组患者年龄较大(p = 0.003),NYHA功能等级较高(p = 0.002),基线心率更快(p = 0.006),吸烟率较高(p = 0.015),整体,身体和情绪MLHFQ得分较高(对于所有患者,p <0.001),左心房(LA)直径较大(p = 0.001),左室充盈时间较短(p = 0.027),E / e'比较高(0.02),等容舒张时间较短(p = 0.028) ),与第II组相比,间隔较低的a'(p = 0.019)和s'(p = 0.023)。整个组中6MWT距离的独立预测因素是HFpEF的MLHFQ总得分增加(p = 0.005),老年(p = 0.035)和糖尿病(p = 0.045)是总MLHFQ(p = 0.007)和糖尿病(p = 0.045),但在HFrEF中只有LA增大(p = 0.005)和年龄(p = 0.013)。MLHFQ总分48.5的敏感性为67%,特异性为63%(ROC分析为72,AUC结论:通过MLHFQ评估,生活质量是6-MWT测得的运动能力的最佳关联,尤其是在HFpEF患者中。尽管HFrEF的射血分数较差,但LA压力升高的迹象独立确定这些患者的运动能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号